Bubble Watch 3/5

We are in the home stretch. Most teams have one regular season game remaining followed by their conference tournaments. Time is growing short to impress the committee.

The Bubble Pecking Order

In for Now

  1. Central Florida (at West Virginia)
  2. Missouri (vs. Arkansas)
  3. TCU (vs. Cincinnati)
  4. Santa Clara (MWC Tourney)
  5. SMU (at FSU)
  6. Indiana (at Ohio State)
  7. New Mexico (at Utah State)

Out for Now

  1. Auburn (at Alabama)
  2. Cincinnati (at TCU)
  3. VCU (at Dayton)
  4. San Diego State (vs. UNLV)
  5. South Florida (at Memphis, vs. Charlotte)
  6. Seton Hall (vs. St. John’s)
  7. Virginia Tech (at Virginia)
  8. Oklahoma (at Texas)

Central Florida, Missouri, and TCU are near locks. But a lot of the teams below them have Quad 1 games remaining, so in theory, quite a few teams could leapfrog them. It’s unlikely that enough teams will jump them that they won’t make it, but another win would end all doubt.

Santa Clara is likely headed for a MWC tournament semifinal showdown with St. Mary’s. A win in that game would punch the Broncos’ ticket. If they lose, it is going to depend on what happens with the teams behind them in the pecking order. My guess is that they squeak in.

SMU needs to beat Florida State on Saturday. If they do, they’re probably OK. If they don’t, it will depend on the teams behind them and bid-stealers.

The Indiana / New Mexico / Auburn / Cincinnati group is very close and hard to differentiate. Interestingly, each has a very difficult road game remaining. Auburn is perhaps the easiest to diagnose. If they win at Alabama, they’ll make the field. If they don’t, they’ll be 16-15 and I don’t see the committee putting them in without a deep SEC Tourney run. Indiana and New Mexico will probably be in if they win, and are not necessarily out if they lose. Cincinnati needs a win, and maybe more.

VCU has to beat Dayton to remain in the conversation. Their best chance is to be the last man standing after the teams in front of them lose.

San Diego State‘s game with UNLV won’t help them. Their only hope, really, is that all the teams above them have tough games. It’s entirely possible that the 5 or 6 teams in front of them all lose and they benefit from that. I’m not sure even that will be enough though. Maybe if they also beat New Mexico or Boise State in the MWC Tournament.

South Florida needs to win the American Tourney. I don’t see them making it as an at-large.

Seton Hall, Virginia Tech, and Oklahoma are longshots, but they do have tough Quad 1 games left, and the teams in front of them could all lose. So if you squint, you can kind of see it. Most likely they have to win and get another similar quality win in their conference tourney to have a shot.

Other Teams

Cal, USC, Stanford, West Virginia, Tulsa… not going to happen.

Miami Ohio is an interesting case. Will they make it as an at-large if they don’t win the MAC Tournament? I don’t think anybody knows for sure. There is no precedent for an unbeaten team who hasn’t played anybody. It will be up to the committee to make a tough decision. The consensus seems to be that they will put the Red Hawks in. I wouldn’t bet on it.

Bracketology 3/4 Update

Summarizing results and changes from Monday & Tuesday games:

  • Duke beat NC State 93-64 and remained a 1 seed
  • Arizona beat Iowa State 73-57 and remained a 1 seed
  • Florida beat Mississippi State 108-74 and remained a 2 seed
  • Illinois beat Oregon 80-54 and remained a 2 seed
  • Iowa State lost to Arizona 73-57 and remained a 3 seed
  • Nebraska lost to UCLA 72-52 and remained a 3 seed
  • Virginia beat Wake Forest 75-70 and remained a 4 seed
  • Kansas lost to Arizona State 70-60 and remained a 4 seed
  • Texas Tech lost to TCU 73-65 and remained a 4 seed
  • Alabama lost to Georgia 98-88 and remained a 4 seed
  • Vanderbilt beat Ole Miss 89-86 and remained a 5 seed
  • Tennessee beat South Carolina 78-59 and remained a 5 seed
  • St. John’s beat Georgetown 72-69 and remained a 5 seed
  • UNC beat Clemson 67-63 and remained a 5 seed
  • Louisville beat Syracuse 77-62 and remained a 6 seed
  • Utah State lost to UNLV 92-65 and dropped from a 6 seed to an 8 seed
  • BYU lost to Cincinnati 90-68 and remained a 7 seed
  • Kentucky lost to Texas A&M 96-85 and remained a 7 seed
  • Clemson lost to UNC 67-63 and remained an 8 seed
  • Georgia beat Alabama 98-88 and jumped from a 9 seed to a 7 seed
  • NC State lost to Duke 93-64 and dropped from a 9 seed to a 10 seed
  • Texas A&M beat Kentucky 96-85 and remained a 9 seed
  • Central Florida lost to Oklahoma State 111-104 and remained a 10 seed
  • Missouri lost to Oklahoma 80-64 and dropped to an 11 seed
  • UCLA beat Nebraska 72-52 and jumped from a 10 seed to an 8 seed
  • Auburn beat LSU 88-74 and remained an 11 seed
  • TCU beat Texas Tech 73-65 and jumped from an 11 seed to a 10 seed
  • San Diego State lost to Boise State 86-77 and dropped from the 2nd team out to the 4th team out
  • VCU beat George Mason 70-65 and remains the 3rd team out
  • Cincinnati beat BYU 90-68 and jumped from the 4th team out to the first team out
  • West Virginia lost to Kansas State 65-63 and dropped from the 6th team out to the 13th team out
  • Seton Hall beat Xavier 77-68 and jumped from the 7th team out to the 5th
  • Oklahoma beat Missouri 80-64 and is now the 7th team out
  • Boise State beat San Diego State 86-77 and is now the 8th team out

Full Bracket:

  1. Duke, Arizona, Michigan, UConn
  2. Florida, Houston, Michigan State, Illinois
  3. Purdue, Iowa State, Gonzaga, Nebraska
  4. Virginia, Kansas, Texas Tech, Alabama
  5. Vanderbilt, Tennessee, St. John’s, UNC
  6. Arkansas, Louisville, Wisconsin, St. Mary’s
  7. St. Louis, BYU, Kentucky, Georgia
  8. Clemson, Iowa, UCLA, Utah State
  9. Miami FL, Villanova, Texas A&M, Texas
  10. NC State, Central Florida, Missouri, TCU
  11. SMU, Ohio State, Santa Clara, New Mexico, Auburn, South Florida
  12. Belmont, Miami OH, McNeese State, High Point
  13. Yale, Liberty, Utah Valley, UNCW
  14. UC Irvine, St. Thomas, Navy, Troy
  15. Wright State, Austin Peay, Northern Colorado, East Tennessee State
  16. Merrimack, UMBC, LIU, Howard, Tennessee State, Bethune Cookman

Last Four Byes: Central Florida, Missouri, TCU, SMU

Last Four In: Ohio State, Santa Clara, New Mexico, Auburn

First Four Out: Cincinnati, Indiana, VCU, San Diego State

Next Four Out: Seton Hall, Virginia Tech, Oklahoma, Boise State

Bracketology 2026

Time to dust off the bracketology spreadsheets. I took last year off but I am back and ready for another run. Let’s get right to it.

Through games of Sunday, March 1. Automatic bids in bold:

  1. Duke, Michigan, Arizona, UConn
  2. Florida, Houston, Illinois, Michigan State
  3. Iowa State, Nebraska, Purdue, Gonzaga
  4. Alabama, Virginia, Kansas, Texas Tech
  5. Vanderbilt, Tennessee, St. John’s, UNC
  6. Arkansas, Louisville, Wisconsin, Utah State
  7. St. Mary’s, St. Louis, BYU, Kentucky
  8. Clemson, Iowa, Miami FL, Villanova
  9. Georgia, NC State, Texas, Texas A&M
  10. Central Florida, Missouri, UCLA, SMU
  11. Ohio State, Santa Clara, New Mexico, Auburn, TCU, South Florida
  12. Belmont, Miami OH, McNeese State, High Point
  13. Yale, Liberty, Utah Valley, UNCW
  14. UC Irvine, St. Thomas, Navy, Troy
  15. Wright State, Austin Peay, East Tennessee State, Montana State
  16. Merrimack, UMBC, LIU, Howard, Tennessee State, Bethune Cookman

Last Four Byes: Missouri, UCLA, SMU, Ohio State

Last Four In: Santa Clara, New Mexico, Auburn, TCU

First Four Out: Indiana, San Diego State, VCU, Cincinnati

Next Four Out: Virginia Tech, West Virginia, Seton Hall, Tulsa

League By League

ACC

Locks (7): Duke, Virginia, UNC, Louisville, Clemson, Miami, NC State. I’m calling the Wolfpack a lock, but if they lose their last two games, things will get uncomfortable.

In for Now (1): SMU. The Mustangs need to win at least one of their two remaining games against Miami and FSU. Winning both would probably move them to a lock.

Work to Do (1): Virginia Tech. The Hokies need to beat Virginia in the last game of the season to give themselves a fighting chance at an at-large bid.

Big 10

Locks (7): Michigan, Illinois, Michigan State, Nebraska, Purdue, Wisconsin, Iowa

In for Now (1): UCLA. I think the Bruins will get in if they beat either Nebraska or USC. If they lose both, they’re in trouble.

Work to Do (3): Ohio State, Indiana, USC. Ohio State and Indiana play each other in the last game of the season. That could be an elimination game. USC is definitely out right now. They have to win their last two games and probably make some noise in the Big 10 Tourney.

Big 12

Locks (6): Arizona, Houston, Iowa State, Kansas, Texas Tech, BYU

In for Now (1): UCF. The Knights should be OK as long as they don’t lose on Tuesday to Oklahoma State.

Work to Do (4): TCU, Cincinnati, West Virginia, Baylor. TCU is really close to the cut line right now. A win at Texas Tech would certainly do it; otherwise they probably have to beat Cincinnati in their last game. The Bearcats have BYU and TCU and probably need a sweep, although even a split would keep them interesting. West Virginia is on the outside looking in right now and must win their last two and make some noise in the Big 12 Tourney. As for Baylor – win at Houston on Wednesday and we’ll talk.

Big East

Locks (3): UConn, St. John’s, Villanova

Work to Do (1): Seton Hall. The Pirates have a tricky Quad 2 game at Xavier, then close with a home tilt against St. John’s. They need to win both.

SEC

Locks (7): Florida, Alabama, Vanderbilt, Tennessee, Arkansas, Kentucky, Georgia

In for Now (2): Texas, Texas A&M. Each needs to win one of their last two to feel secure.

Work to Do (2): Missouri, Auburn. Missouri has two Quad 1 games left at Oklahoma and vs. Arkansas. Two wins and they’re in, one win and they’ll be sweating it, two losses and they’re in trouble. Auburn has been taking on serious water. The LSU game on Tuesday is a must win, and they’ll need more than that to feel secure on Selection Sunday.

West Coast

Locks (2): Gonzaga, St. Mary’s

Work to Do (1): Santa Clara. Herb Sendek’s crew has finished their regular season. They need to beat St. Mary’s in the WCC Tournament to feel secure; otherwise they’ll be sweating on Selection Sunday.

Mountain West

Locks (1): Utah State

Work to Do (2): New Mexico, San Diego State. Both of these teams are very close to the cut line. The Lobos have an opportunity to cement a birth with their finale at Utah State. The Aztecs need a win at Boise on Tuesday to have a chance.

Atlantic 10

Locks (1): St. Louis

Work to Do (1): VCU. If the Rams win their last two regular season games, they will be very close to the cut line. It might be enough.

All other leagues are one-bid leagues.

ACC Home Court Advantage

I’ve been meaning to do a study on which ACC arena gives the biggest home court advantage. And I finally got around to it. Before I reveal any data – what is your guess?

It’s not obvious how to measure home court advantage. Kenpom has a way of doing it, but I decided to create my own, based on the data available to me. It’s pretty simple. For each team/arena, I calculated the difference between the team’s home winning percentage and their road winning percentage in regular season conference games only. I looked at conference games only to eliminate any noise that might be introduced by differences in non-conference strength of schedule.

For instance, let’s take Pitt. Since they’ve been a member of the ACC, through 2023, they’ve won 46.2% of their ACC games at Petersen Events Center and 26.4% on the road. So that’s a home court advantage of 19.8%.

I did this same calculation for each team/home arena, leaving out small sample sizes such as Wake Forest playing the occasional home game at Greensboro Coliseum or Georgia Tech playing at the Omni.

Here are the results, ordered from biggest home court advantage to smallest. If you guessed Littlejohn, you’re right:

TeamArenaYearsHomeRoadHome Adv
ClemsonLittlejohn Coliseum1969-present58.5%22.9%35.6%
MarylandComcast/
Xfinity
2003-201468.4%34.7%33.7%
Wake ForestLawrence Joel 1990-present61.1%28.2%32.9%
VirginiaUniversity Hall1966-200661.4%29.0%32.4%
Georgia TechMcCamish/Alexander1981-present55.3%26.1%29.2%
ClemsonClemson Field House1954-196845.6%18.3%27.3%
VirginiaMemorial Gym1954-196538.7%11.5%27.2%
Florida StateTucker/ Leon Co.all62.3%35.3%27.0%
Wake ForestWinston-Salem Memorial 1957-198955.7%30.0%25.7%
MarylandCole Field House1954-200263.3%37.7%25.6%
Virginia TechCassell Coliseumall57.3%31.9%25.4%
DukeCameron Indoor all79.3%54.7%24.6%
Miami (FL)BankUnited/Watscoall61.1%36.7%24.4%
NC StateReynolds Coliseum1954-199961.9%37.5%24.4%
North CarolinaCarmichael 1966-198687.6%63.7%23.9%
Notre DameJoyce Centerall59.8%36.2%23.6%
LouisvilleKFC Yum Centerall64.2%41.5%22.7%
South CarolinaCarolina Fieldhouse1954-196843.7%21.1%22.6%
VirginiaJPJ Arena2007-present76.5%54.7%21.8%
Boston CollegeConte Forumall44.9%23.2%21.7%
North CarolinaSmith Center1986-present78.1%57.6%20.5%
PittsburghPetersen all46.2%26.4%19.8%
North CarolinaWoollen Gym1954-196578.9%59.2%19.7%
SyracuseCarrier Dome/JMA all63.0%43.5%19.5%
NC StatePNC/RBC2000-present54.6%35.4%19.2%
Wake ForestGore Gym1954-195675.0%59.1%15.9%
South CarolinaCarolina Coliseum1969-197092.3%84.6%7.7%

NC State fans won’t be surprised to learn that PNC has the smallest advantage of any arena, excepting Gore Gym and Carolina Coliseum which have only a few years of data.

I think the biggest surprise to me is the size of the home court advantage overall. Would you have guessed that Clemson has won a higher percentage of their home games at Littlejohn than Carolina has won of their road games since the Dean Dome opened in 1986? I would not have.

Another way to say that is that on average, you’d have a better chance against Carolina at home than against Clemson at Littlejohn. Obviously that varies wildly from year to year, but as a general result, I find that surprising.

The other number that pops is Carolina’s 87.6% winning percentage at Carmichael.

The Greatness of Mariano, Part 3

What was Mariano Rivera’s best season?

Was it 1996, when he came out of nowhere to be the bullpen workhorse for the World Series champion Yankees, throwing 107 innings, giving up 73 hits, striking out 130, finishing third in Cy Young voting as a middle reliever, giving up one run in 14.1 innings in the postseason, and prompting Twins’ manager Tom Kelly to say “We don’t need to face him anymore… He needs to pitch in a higher league, if there is one. Ban him from baseball. He should be illegal.”

Or maybe it was 1999, when he led the league in saves, held opponents to a .176 average and a .476 OPS, didn’t give up a run in 12.1 postseason innings, finished third again in Cy Young voting, and was named World Series MVP?

Or maybe it was 2004, when he racked up 53 saves in 57 opportunities, finished third again in Cy Young voting, and ninth in the MVP vote?

No, it has to be 2005, when he came in with a career-best 1.38 ERA, gave up 9 extra-base hits in 283 at bats, allowed only 2 of 18 inherited runners to score, and finished second in Cy Young and ninth again in MVP voting.

How about 2008 when he notched a 1.40 ERA, gave up a ridiculous 41 hits and 6 walks against 77 strikeouts in 70.2 innings, held opponents to a .190 on-base percentage, and blew only one save all year?

Wait – how about 2009, when he saved 44 in 46 opportunities and gave up one run in 16 postseason innings to lead the Yankees to another World Series championship?

Is there any other player in baseball history – not just a relief pitcher, but any player at all – whose best season is so difficult to pick out?

Observations About Aaron Judge

I don’t usually write about what’s happening right now in MLB. Honestly, I don’t have the time to write fast enough to keep up. But I’m going to make an exception here because I’ve been thinking about Aaron Judge, why he’s been so bad in the postseason, and what it will take for him to get better.

Aaron Judge is a unique hitter. I know we all know that, but I’m not sure we recognize the extent to which he is unique. His uniqueness is his strength, but it is also his vulnerability. Let me try to summarize what I am getting at.

  1. Aaron Judge is, by far, the greatest hitter of all time when not striking out.
  2. This is because, when he puts the ball in play, he hits it very hard more consistently than anyone else in history.
  3. He is able to do this for three reasons. One, his immense size and strength; two, his picture-perfect swing; three, and most germane to this discussion, his refusal to compromise the integrity of his swing in any situation.
  4. As a result of his refusal to compromise his swing, he is particularly helpless when swinging at pitches outside the strike zone.

Now I will elaborate on each of these points.

Point 1

This is actually quite easy to establish. I pulled the stats of the eight guys with the highest Adjusted OPS+ in MLB history and calculated their slash lines (Avg/OBP/Slugging) when not striking out. Here they are:

  • Ruth: .406/.535/.819
  • Williams: .379/.519/.698
  • Bonds: .353/.506/.719
  • Gehrig: .377/.482/.702
  • Hornsby: .391/.456/.629
  • Judge: .436/.563/.915
  • Trout: .409/.528/.795
  • Mantle: .378/.507./.706

That’s clear, isn’t it? His Career OPS when not striking out is 1.478. Judge is the best. It’s not even close.

Point 2

I can’t establish this with certainty because obviously we don’t have batted ball data for older players. But Judge certainly rules this category among modern players. To be clear, I’m talking about his average batted ball, not the maximum; there are a few others such as Ohtani, Oneil Cruz, and Stanton whose max exit velocity is higher than Judge’s.

There are a number of advanced statistics that attempt to measure how hard a player is hitting the ball. The best known is exit velocity. Judge has led the league in average exit velocity four straight seasons.

Another advanced statistic is “barrels”. I will admit that I’m not entirely clear on what constitutes a barrel, but whatever it is, Aaron Judge is a helluva lot better at it than anyone else. Here are the leaders for the last three seasons in barrels per batted ball (i.e. per ball put in play, anything other than a strikeout):

2022:

  1. Judge, 26.5%
  2. Alvarez, 21.0%
  3. Schwarber, 20.1%
  4. Trout, 19.7%
  5. Stanton, 19.3%

2023:

  1. Judge, 27.5%
  2. Ohtani, 19.6%
  3. Alvarez, 18%
  4. JD Martinez, 17.1%
  5. Matt Chapman, 17.1%

2024:

  1. Judge, 26.9%
  2. Ohtani, 21.5%
  3. Stanton, 20.7%
  4. Soto, 19.7%
  5. Michael Toglia, 17.3%

Aaron Judge hits the ball harder, more consistently, than anyone else. And that’s why he’s the greatest hitter that ever lived when not striking out.

Why is Judge able to hit the ball so hard, when he does hit it? This is more subjective, but watching him so much over the years, I think it comes down to his physique and his swing.

Points 3 and 4

Obviously the man is immensely strong. He’s probably one of the strongest players ever to play the game. His height, while it does give him a big strike zone, also enables him to cover the plate. He can easily barrel a ball on the outside corner and hit it out to right.

In turn, he has adopted a hitting style uniquely suited to take advantage of his size and strength. He knows he does not need to pull the ball; he just needs to barrel it. This allows him to simplify his approach immensely. He does not need to look for a pitch in a particular location; he can go with it. Pitches at the edge of the zone that other hitters can’t barrel, he can. And if the gets the barrel to it, he wins.

But as important as his physique is, his swing is more important. We’ve all seen it in slow-motion a hundred times now – smooth, fluid, balanced, on plane, and yet incredibly powerful. And he repeats it every single time. He doesn’t choke up with two strikes; he doesn’t try to just put it in play; he’s not hitting behind the runner, or trying to hit a sac fly, or any of that. He has one swing, it’s his “A” swing, and he never, ever changes it based on the situation.

It’s this invariability of his swing that I want to focus on. My theory is that it’s this invariability that has enabled him to refine and perfect his swing so masterfully, almost like a golfer. Combined with his size and strength, it enables him to get the barrel to the ball more than anyone else when the ball is in his hitting zone – which includes most of the strike zone.

But there’s a trade off, and we’ve already alluded to it. He doesn’t foul off pitches off the plate with two strikes, because you have to change your swing to do that. He either takes them or strikes out. He hits very few bloopers, or weak grounders, or pop-ups, because most soft contact is the result of a defensive swing, and Aaron Judge doesn’t do defensive swings. He’s also a terrible bad ball hitter. Remember the home run Stanton hit in Game 1 off Jack Flaherty, where he went down and golfed that breaking ball? Judge, with all due respect, could never do that.

So this picture-perfect, repeatable, almost robotic (in a good way) swing makes him the greatest hitter that ever lived on balls in the zone; but it makes him absolutely incapable of hitting, or even spoiling, balls outside the zone. If he gets a hit with two strikes, it’s because the pitcher missed his location. The kind of epic at bat that Soto had in ALCS Game 5, fouling off a bunch of tough pitches until he got one he could handle, is inconceivable for Judge.

What it really comes down to is this: he can’t chase. If he chases, he’s toast. Where he’s gotten better over the years is reducing his chase rate. His 2024 chase rate was 18.7%, the lowest of his career and almost ten percent lower than the MLB average of 28.5%. And, supporting what I’ve been saying, when he does chase, he makes contact only 42.7% of the time, 15% lower than the MLB average.

The thing is, in spite of all the walks he draws, he is fundamentally and temperamentally an aggressive hitter. He goes up there looking to do damage, not to get on base. In the regular season, he’s gotten very good at controlling and channeling that aggression by laying off tough pitches. In the postseason, probably because of the immense pressure that is on him, he has been unable to do that, and pitchers are using his aggressiveness against him. Somehow he has to get back to normal, let the game come to him, let those pitches go, and get into hitters’ counts. If he can do that, I am confident the real Aaron Judge will emerge.

As frustrating as it is to see him refuse to change his swing with two strikes and strike out, the repeatability of his swing is what makes him Aaron Judge. He just has to swing at pitches he can reach. If he does not get himself out by chasing, he’s the best hitter that ever lived. If I were him – and what do I know – I would resolve in the next couple games not to swing at a breaking ball until he has two strikes. They have no intention of throwing him a breaking ball in the zone. If that means you take the occasional mistake hanger, so be it.

The Greatness of Mariano, Part 2

We all know that Mariano was great in the postseason. But how great was he, exactly?

The numbers tell the tale:

GW-LIPHERBBKERASaves
968-11418611211100.7042
Mariano Rivera, postseason career

I think we’ve all heard about his postseason greatness so much that we’ve become desensitized to how amazing that stat line actually is… an ERA of 0.70 over a span of 141 innings in 96 games, in the highest leverage situations imaginable? Oh, and I forgot to mention – two home runs allowed in those 141 innings. The same number of postseason home runs allowed by Emmanuel Clase, the greatest closer in baseball right now, in one-third of an inning last night. Rivera, in those 96 postseason appearances, gave up more than one earned run exactly once. Clase has done it twice in the past two weeks.

There are so many ways to look at how great this is. One that I decided to investigate is: has any reliever in MLB history ever had a span of 96 games – not postseason games, but any games – with a better ERA than that? And the answer is yes – but only one. Can you guess who it is? I wouldn’t have.

I know the suspense is killing you, so I’ll tell you. Wade Davis of the 2014-2015 Royals had a span of 96 regular season games from late April 2014 through early July 2015 in which his stats were:

GW-LIPHERBBKERASaves
9612-296.2485281200.4712
Wade Davis, April 2014 – July 2015

The crazy thing is that for most of that period, Davis wasn’t the Royals’ closer. Greg Holland was. The 2014 Royals may have had the greatest bullpen in MLB history with Holland, Davis, and Kelvin Herrera. And Davis’ postseason performance in 2014 and 2015 is right up there with Rivera’s. He gave up one run in 25 innings. Considered as a span, Davis 2014-2015 is arguably the greatest two-season relief pitching span in MLB history. Of course there is no comparison in terms of leverage – Davis’ span was mostly compiled in the regular season, and he wasn’t even the closer. But he was darn good.

So there you have it. Mariano’s postseason career, if considered as a span of games, represents the second-greatest 96-game span that any reliever has ever had.

1. 1974 NC State

Record: 30-1, 12-0 (1st place)
ACC Tournament: Won
NCAA Tournament: Won
Final AP Ranking: 1
All-ACC Players: David Thompson (ACC POY), Monte Towe (1st), Tom Burleson (2nd)
All-Americans: David Thompson (National POY)

An overdue post to close out this series.

I don’t think this is a controversial choice, but it’s not an inarguable one either. Certainly 1957 North Carolina, with its undefeated record, has an argument. 1992 Duke has an argument as well. Perhaps arguments could be made for other teams. But in the final analysis, I think the ’74 Wolfpack has the strongest claim to be the best team in ACC history. Look at all the boxes they check:

  • Won the national championship
  • Won the ACC Tournament
  • Undefeated in the ACC regular season
  • One loss overall (1957 UNC and 1973 NC State are the only other teams with less than two)
  • Had the national and ACC POY (and greatest player in ACC history)
  • Had three of the top six vote-getters for All-ACC, one of only 10 teams in ACC history to do that
  • Played the toughest schedule in the nation (according to Simple Rating System on sports-reference.com)
  • Went 6-0 against North Carolina and Maryland, both ranked in the Top 5 all year
  • Beat UCLA, winners of the previous seven national championships, in the NCAA Tournament

That about covers it, wouldn’t you say? One other point in their favor is that the 1973 team went 27-0. I’m evaluating the 1974 team on its own merits, but the 1973 team’s results at least support the conclusion that there was nothing fluky about the 1974 season.

They played fast. They are one of only seven ACC teams to average 90+ points per game. The fastest-paced teams in league history were probably in the mid-1950s, but after than, Thompson/Towe-era NC State would be at the top of the list.

It was an aesthetically pleasing brand of basketball, playing fast and making shots. Words like grace, artistry, and even majesty were invoked by admirers. Towe and Thompson perfected the alley-oop – not the rim-rattling variety that we are used to, because dunking was against the rules, but a gentler, more artistic alley-oop where Thompson would catch the ball and lay it in in one motion.

They were a great rebounding team. Burleson is one of the all-time great rebounders in the league, Thompson is perhaps the best 6’4″ rebounder ever, and Phil Spence was there to clean up any boards they left behind.

Their complementary players were better than you think. Mo Rivers and Spence were important additions that made the 1974 team better than the 1973 edition. Tim Stoddard was an excellent passer who often initiated the offense as a kind of point-forward.

Thompson, of course, was the straw that stirred the drink. His offensive efficiency was off the charts, shooting 55% from the field on 19 FG attempts per game. He was able to elevate his game at critical moments. As Bobby Jones said, “He just will not let them lose. If State needs something, Thompson will get it for them. He’s just the best I’ve ever been around.”

Their one loss was an 84-66 whipping at the hands of UCLA in the third game of the season. After going 27-0 the previous year but not being able to play in the NCAA Tournament, they needed a test. They got one, and they failed. It was probably the best thing that could have happened to them. After that, the Wolfpack met every challenge. They beat #4 North Carolina 78-77 in the Big Four Tournament; beat #3 Maryland 80-74; beat Carolina again, this time 83-80, at Carmichael; came from behind in the second half to win on the road at Purdue; won at Maryland 86-80; and tacked on a home win over the Tar Heels for good measure, closing the regular season at 22-1.

The five-game run this team went on to close the season is one of the great stretches in the history of college basketball.

  1. ACC Tournament Final: A 103-100 overtime win over #4 Maryland in the “greatest game ever played”. Burleson played like a man possessed with 38 points and 13 rebounds.
  2. Regional Semifinal: A 92-78 win over #5 Providence, which featured Consensus All-American Marvin Barnes. Thompson dropped 40 on them and Burleson grabbed 24 rebounds.
  3. Regional Final: Ran Pitt off the court, 100-72. This was the game where Thompson hit his head on the floor and everybody thought he was dead.
  4. National Semifinal: The double-OT 80-77 win over #2 UCLA, breaking the Bruins’ streaks of seven straight national titles and 30 consecutive wins in the NCAA tournament.
  5. National Final: A 76-64 win over #3 Marquette to secure the national championship.

2. 1992 Duke

Record: 34-2, 14-2 (1st place)
ACC Tournament: Won
NCAA Tournament: Won
Final AP Ranking: 1
All-ACC Players: Christian Laettner (ACC POY), Bobby Hurley (2nd), Grant Hill (2nd), Thomas Hill (3rd)
All-Americans: Christian Laettner (National POY)

There are five teams in college basketball history that won a national championship and then returned essentially the same team the next year: 1967-8 UCLA, 1984-5 Georgetown, 1994-5 Arkansas, 2006-7 Florida, and 1991-2 Duke. All five teams reached the national final the next year. UCLA, Florida, and Duke won, while Georgetown and Arkansas lost. These teams are rightly recognized as among the best in the history of college basketball.

While 1992 Duke was essentially the same team as 1991, there was a little bit of roster change. Greg Koubek, a rotation big man who gave the ’91 team about 15 minutes a game, graduated. Billy McCaffrey, the second-leading scorer and an integral part of the 1991 team, decided to transfer. The only newcomer of note was Cherokee Parks, and he didn’t play a lot as a freshman. Mostly Coach K just tightened the rotation. McCaffrey’s playing time went to Thomas Hill, Grant Hill, and Brian Davis, all of whom went from 25 minutes per game to 30. Antonio Lang, who fell out of the rotation late in 1991, was a key player in 1992. The cornerstones, of course, were Hurley and Laettner.

Everybody got better in ’92. Laettner suddenly started raining threes, shooting 56% from the arc – still a conference record (provided we overlook Terry Gannon’s 59% in 1983 from 17’9″, and we should). Hurley’s scoring went up, FG% and FT% went up, assists went up, turnovers went down, fouls went down. Grant Hill took big steps forward in every category. Thomas Hill and Brian Davis contributed more.

This is probably the best offensive team in ACC history. They averaged 88 points per game on 54% shooting as a team. That is far and away the best FG% in league history, a full two percentage points better than 1998 UNC. They weren’t a great rebounding team; I don’t think they were an exceptional defensive team, although they could be very good at times. But they could put the ball in the basket as well as any team who ever played in the ACC.

Because of the inconsistent defense, there were a few regular season games where they couldn’t stop anybody and had to outscore them – which they did. They allowed 91 points to William and Mary. The beat Maryland 91-89 and Clemson 98-97. It seems the defense got better in the late stages of the season. After a 25-2 regular season, they cut through the ACC Tournament like a buzzsaw, dominating North Carolina 94-74 in the final.

The NCAA Tournament is remembered, and rightfully so, for the all-time classic regional final between Duke and Kentucky. What I didn’t remember as well was Duke’s next game, the national semifinal against Indiana. This was a really good Indiana team with Alan Henderson and Calbert Cheaney. Indiana started out on fire and opened up a 12-point lead late in the first half. At that point, the Blue Devils flipped a switch. Over the next 15 minutes or so of game action spanning the first and second halves, they went on a 31-6 run to turn the 12-point deficit into a 13-point lead, and that was effectively the ballgame. Indiana, to their credit, improbably clawed back into it late. A seldom-used player named Todd Leary hit three threes in a span of 25 seconds (!), and the Hoosiers had a possession down three with a chance to tie. But they couldn’t convert, and that was the Hoosiers’ last chance. Indiana committed 33 fouls in the game. The officiating prompted Bob Knight to call Ted Valentine “the greatest travesty I’ve ever seen in basketball in 33 years as a college head coach” after Valentine tagged him with a dubious technical in the second half.

The final was not one of the great ones. After a competitive first half, Duke dominated the second half with their defense, limiting Michigan to 51 points for the game. The Fab Five, as great as they were, were no match for the experience of this Duke group on the biggest stage. Hurley, not Laettner, was the Most Outstanding Player, and he deserved it, playing extremely well in the Final Four.

An oddity about this team is that they went wire-to-wire as the #1 team in the country despite losing two games. It’s unusual for a #1 team to lose and retain the top ranking, but it can happen, and here’s an example. Duke’s first loss was on February 5 at #9 Carolina. But #2 Oklahoma State and #3 Kansas also lost that week. What’s more, before next week’s poll came out, the Blue Devils went down to Baton Rouge and beat Shaq and LSU. So they retained the top spot.

Duke’s second loss was on February 23 at Wake Forest. But wouldn’t you know it, #2 UCLA, #3 Kansas, #4 Carolina, #5 Arizona, and #6 Ohio State all lost that same week. So Duke remained #1. They didn’t lose again.

This team has a very strong case to be #1. Their top 3 players (Laettner, Hurley, Hill) match up against anybody. It was almost a coin flip for me. I’ll explain my rationale in my final post in this series.

3. 1957 North Carolina

Record: 32-0, 14-0 (1st place)
ACC Tournament: Won
NCAA Tournament: Won
Final AP Ranking: 1
All-ACC Players: Lennie Rosenbluth (ACC POY), Tommy Kearns (1st), Pete Brennan (2nd)
All-Americans: Lennie Rosenbluth (National POY)

Now we come to the three teams with the strongest claims on being the greatest ACC basketball team ever: 1957 North Carolina, 1974 NC State, and 1992 Duke.

Coming into the 1957 season, things were looking up for Frank McGuire. He had been steadily building the program, funneling player after player from New York down south to build his roster. The 1956 team had been ranked as high as fourth nationally. The core of that team – Lennie Rosenbluth, Pete Brennan, Joe Quigg, and Tommy Kearns – was back in 1957. The Tar Heels were ranked sixth in the preseason poll.

Coach McGuire knew he had a good team and created a challenging non-conference schedule. Just before Christmas, they traveled north to play NYU, Dartmouth, and Holy Cross on back-to-back-to-back nights. Then, just after Christmas, they swept through the Dixie Classic, beating a very good Utah team, ninth-ranked Duke, and a tough Wake Forest team. A January 15 win over NC State brought the Tar Heels to 15-0 and a #1 ranking in the polls.

It was the next two games that took things from “they’re having a great season” to “maybe this is a team of destiny”. At Maryland, the Tar Heels trailed late but took advantage of a free throw miss to force overtime, eventually winning 65-61 in double OT. In the next game, Duke clawed back from an eight-point deficit to tie the game with 21 seconds left. Unfortunately for them, the Woollen Gym scoreboard was a little slow to update, and Duke’s Bobby Joe Harris thought the Blue Devils were still down two. He intentionally fouled Kearns, who sank two free throws to give the Tar Heels the winning margin.

From there, the biggest tests were three more tough games with Wake Forest, with the Tar Heels winning by three and five in the regular season and two in the semifinals of the ACC Tournament. With an easy win over South Carolina in the final, the they entered the NCAA Tournament at 26-0.

One gets the impression that McGuire hated the pressure that came with being undefeated and would have been perfectly happy with a loss somewhere along the way. According to ACC Basketball: An Illustrated History, McGuire said, “I don’t know how we keep winning… our kids are feeling the pressure building up from our winning streak. I think we’d be a better ballclub if we got knocked off in a couple of games. There’s no such thing as an undefeated season in basketball.”

Turns out, there is. It just takes back-to-back triple overtime wins in the Final Four.

The obvious question to ask is, as the only undefeated national championship team in league history, why isn’t 1957 Carolina #1? After all, they didn’t lose a game. What else could they have done? There is a certain unanswerable logic to that argument.

But the margin between a team that lost zero games and a team that lost one or two is razor-thin. If the Woollen Gym scoreboard operator had been a little quicker, this team might have been 30-1.

It seems that everyone who watched this team felt they had been lucky. NC State coach Everett Case said, “They’ve got a fine ballclub, but I think somebody’ll knock ’em off before the end of the season.” Duke coach Hal Bradley: “Carolina has a fine team… but I don’t think they have a great team. They are experiencing too many scares.” Call that sour grapes if you want, but even McGuire said “It’s uncanny how we could’ve kept our undefeated season going. We were lucky, awfully lucky, all season long in close games.”

In the final analysis, I give a slight edge to 1974 NC State and 1992 Duke. They had an element of dominance that seems lacking from the ’57 Tar Heels, and the ACC they faced was better from top to bottom.

But with each passing year, it seems less likely that another team from the ACC, or perhaps from any conference, will go undefeated again. The 1957 Tar Heels stand alone in the long and illustrious history of ACC basketball.